

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Oscar pool just got a bit more complicated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scarecrow.com/2009/06/24/your-oscar-pool-just-got-a-bit-more-complicated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scarecrow.com/2009/06/24/your-oscar-pool-just-got-a-bit-more-complicated/</link>
	<description>A store dedicated to the love of movies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: madamecrow</title>
		<link>http://www.scarecrow.com/2009/06/24/your-oscar-pool-just-got-a-bit-more-complicated/comment-page-1/#comment-9657</link>
		<dc:creator>madamecrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scarecrow.com/?p=821#comment-9657</guid>
		<description>ah, i guess my joke about popular movies that don&#039;t necessarily deserve nominations didn&#039;t work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, i guess my joke about popular movies that don&#8217;t necessarily deserve nominations didn&#8217;t work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notanumber</title>
		<link>http://www.scarecrow.com/2009/06/24/your-oscar-pool-just-got-a-bit-more-complicated/comment-page-1/#comment-9656</link>
		<dc:creator>notanumber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scarecrow.com/?p=821#comment-9656</guid>
		<description>Best Picture? Yea, right  What, another time travel story?  Wow, that&#039;s original. And hold the camera still!  Wait, I forgot, that&#039;s &#039;edgy&#039; (or something). Scotty in the water ride. Product placement!?!?!  etc. Oh don&#039;t get me started...  Great I guess if  you grew up playing video games and not actually reading science fiction (much like the instantly forgettable Star Wars films).  Should rake in the bucks, if that&#039;s what&#039;s important.  Liked Bones though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best Picture? Yea, right  What, another time travel story?  Wow, that&#8217;s original. And hold the camera still!  Wait, I forgot, that&#8217;s &#8216;edgy&#8217; (or something). Scotty in the water ride. Product placement!?!?!  etc. Oh don&#8217;t get me started&#8230;  Great I guess if  you grew up playing video games and not actually reading science fiction (much like the instantly forgettable Star Wars films).  Should rake in the bucks, if that&#8217;s what&#8217;s important.  Liked Bones though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madamecrow</title>
		<link>http://www.scarecrow.com/2009/06/24/your-oscar-pool-just-got-a-bit-more-complicated/comment-page-1/#comment-9655</link>
		<dc:creator>madamecrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scarecrow.com/?p=821#comment-9655</guid>
		<description>It looks like Entertainment Weekly&#039;s Dave Karger agrees with me about Star Trek: http://oscar-watch.ew.com/2009/06/2010-oscars-to-have-10-best-picture-nominees.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Entertainment Weekly&#8217;s Dave Karger agrees with me about Star Trek: <a href="http://oscar-watch.ew.com/2009/06/2010-oscars-to-have-10-best-picture-nominees.html" rel="nofollow">http://oscar-watch.ew.com/2009/06/2010-oscars-to-have-10-best-picture-nominees.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
